Mussio Goodman is proud to display our recent legal decisions in the legal field of personal injury claims and estate litigation claims.
Mussio Goodman Wins Against ICBC in Court As previously discussed, when an injured motorist first informs ICBC of the accident, one of the questions they may be asked is whether they were working at the time of the collision. The reason is, if both drivers involved in the accident were “workers” as defined by the […]
Court Awards Our Client $204,000 For ICBC Blunder As we recently announced, after our client rejected ICBC’s $25,000 offer, we proceeded to trial and were awarded $204,000 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. With any successful judgment, we were also awarded “costs”, which is essentially an award of additional money to compensate for the work […]
Mussio Goodman was Successful in Supreme Court of British Columbia for Liability of Bus Driver We are pleased to announce that the Supreme Court of British Columbia has found the defendant bus driver liable for our client’s broken ankle and shoulder. In this case, our client was attempting to catch a bus which was stopped […]
Mussio Goodman Wins Another WCB Tribunal Decision Against ICBC When an injured motorist first informs ICBC of the accident, one of the questions they may be asked is whether they were working at the time of the collision. This is because, if both drivers were “workers” as defined by the Workers Compensation Act, there can […]
Mussio Goodman has Successfully Won $290,400 for Our Client We are pleased to announce that, after declining ICBC’s offer to settle for $115,000, our client proceeded to a two week jury trial resulting in an award of $290,400. The primary issue in this case was “causation”. In April 2009, our client was rear-ended at a […]
Mussio Goodman Proved Defendant’s Liability, Despite ICBC Offer We are pleased to announce that, after a three-day trial in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the Defendant was found to be 100% responsible for the car accident that caused significant injuries to our client. The case was initially characterized as a “he said/she said” dispute […]
